Timing methodology · current review

How we’re checking lap timing accuracy

We compare the app’s lap registrations with frame-by-frame video of the car crossing the finish line.

Current status: preliminary visual evaluation. A validated accuracy rating and end-to-end processing-delay figure have not yet been established.

Watch the video example

See Backyard Lap Timer in action.

01

Record a reference pass

Review footage recorded at 240 frames per second. The center of the front wheel is followed as a consistent visual point on the car.

02

Mark the registered crossing

Frames immediately before and after the app registers a lap are compared with the frame where the car appears to cross the physical finish line.

03

Estimate the physical line

A wooden board in the scene is used as a visual reference for the line marked in the app. It helps locate the crossing, but the camera is not perfectly aligned with the phone, so perspective adds uncertainty.

What this review can tell us

At 240 fps, consecutive video frames are nominally about 4.17 milliseconds apart. Frame-by-frame review helps locate a crossing within the recorded sequence and compare it with the app’s registration.

That 4.17 ms interval describes the video’s frame spacing; it does not prove the app is accurate to 4.17 ms. The current images also do not establish a validated distribution of lap-time error or a precise end-to-end processing delay. Camera alignment and the estimated finish-line position remain sources of uncertainty.

Preliminary findings

What the test shows so far

These findings are provisional. No numerical lap-time error or per-crossing processing delay has been validated yet; more controlled tests and paired timing data are needed.

Want to help test?

If you’d like to participate or send reference footage and lap data, please email backyardlaptimer@gmail.com.

Back to Good to Know